Human Resources seems to be ever-changing. It has moved from providing a purely Personnel function focusing mostly on administration to a more supportive function of acknowledging the value of employees as an organisational resource.
However, by referring to employees as capital or resources suggests that people are valued mainly for their money making potential. It refers to “the productive capacities of human beings as income-producing agents in an economy” (Hornbeck & Salamon). If one were to analyse the discourse used, it is easy to see that employees are viewed as an investment. When describing people in those terms one can also describe people as liabilities or assets, which is dehumanising. Employees are no longer viewed as people, but commodities and money-making machines. “Income-producing agents” suggests that employees are simply there to produce a specific outcome, namely making money for the organisation and have no other needs to be fulfilled in the working environment.
Google for example, now speaks of a People Operations division. As the narrative begins to change, so should the processes compricing the People Division.
Due to an ever changing world, including increasing globalisation, tougher competition, rapid technological changes and employees’ capabilities and priorities, there is a requirement for HR to move away from simply dealing with resources, to become a strategic business partner, whereby they play a key role in assisting organisations navigate through these transitions and view people as the driving force of the change.
The People Division requires a mind-set change. One way of achieving this is by the People Division creating an Agile workforce. Agile principles change the focus from imposing controls and standards to empowering collaboration and innovation. These principles can be described as a from-to comparison, such as:
- From a Remedial approach to learning (training is prescribed to employees who are underperforming or who are preparing for a new role) to a Continuous learning environment (employees are given many opportunities to learn and develop themselves independent of a specific, job-related goal).
- From a “Recruiting” mind-set (as a vacancy appear, a person is found to fill the vacancy) to a Continuous talent acquisition mindset (organisations invest in their employees and nurture talent within the organisation).
- From Opaque talent processes (talent management is owned by HR, and the processes by which talent is acquired, evaluated, and developed are hidden and inaccessible) to Transparent access to talent information (talent management is facilitated by HR, which empowers employees to take ownership of their own development. Employees understand and are active participants in talent acquisition, evaluation, and development processes).
- From a Hierarchical structure (decision-making power centralised at the top) to Empowering (employees empowered to make decisions in their speciality).
- From Annual Performance management (annual cascading performance objectives and reviews) to Flexible Performance Management(performance objectives that can easily change based on quarterly targets or group objectives. Frequent, real-time performance feedback from multiple sources.).
- From HR as “system of record” (the HR function is focused on record-keeping and defensibility. HR success is measured in the completeness of documentation) to HR as “system of engagement” (the HR function is focused on engaging employees to enhance self-motivation and encourage collaboration. HR success is measured in terms of retention, employee satisfaction and innovation levels).
- From Siloed objectives (jobs are discrete elements in a complex system. Job requirements are related to specific workplace tasks) to Unified mission and values (all jobs directly support the mission and values of the organisation, and all employees understand how their performance supports the organisational culture).
Baptiste, I. (2001). Educating lone wolves: Pedagogical implications of Human Capital Theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 184-201.
Deloitte. (2017). Agile model of HR. Retrieved from http://www.bersin.com/Lexicon/details.aspx?id=15373.
Gothelf, J. (2017). How HR can become agile (and why it needs to). Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/06/how-hr-can-become-agile-and-why-it-needs-to.
Hornbeck, D.W., & Salamon, L.M. (Eds.). (1991). Human capital and America’s future: An economic strategy for the nineties. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Human Resources Systems Group. (2016). What is Agile HR? And is it right for you? Retrieved from http://resources.hrsg.ca/blog/what-is-agile-hr-and-is-it-right-for-you.
May, K.E. (2016). Work in the 21st Century: The Changing Role of Human Resources. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/tip/backissues/tipjan98/may.aspx.
Mehta, N. (2016). Getting performance management right. Retrieved from https://www.trainingjournal.com/articles/feature/getting-performance-management-right.
Muller, D. (2014). Perception vs. Reality: Employees, HR and the things we believe. Retrieved from https://hracuity.com/perception-vs-reality-employees-hr-things-believe/.
O’Donnell, D., McGuire, D., & Cross, C. (2006). Critically challenging some assumptions in HRD. International Journal of Training and Development, 10(1), 4-16.